Why Brant County voted down #ElectRespect pledge

Article content material

Thirty-one municipalities have pledged to uphold a secure and respectful democracy — Brant County wasn’t one in every of them.

Article content material

A tie vote final week prevented the county from becoming a member of the #ElectRespect pledge, an initiative the Halton Elected Representatives began to “restore civility and respect to the general public sq.,” based on its web site.

Article content material

Recommended Videos

Article content material

It left some locals questioning why.

“Aside from one councillor’s considerations about how the data was obtained, there was no dialogue. They simply voted towards it and moved on. It sends a horrible message,” Kari Raymer Bishop instructed The Spectator.

Last municipal election, some candidates in Brant — who had been individuals of color — obtained “bigoted feedback” and “hate,” Coun. Lukas Oakley mentioned when bringing the decision ahead.

“And I believe that’s one thing that we as a municipality have an obligation to name out and never help in any approach in our group both by direct motion or inaction,” he mentioned.

Article content material

If handed, the decision mentioned the county was committing to — amongst different issues — treating others with respect in all areas, rejecting harassment and focusing debate on insurance policies reasonably than private assaults.

It additionally concerned calling on others to signal the pledge, and sending a replica of the decision to the Association of Municipalities of Ontario, Ontario’s Big City Mayors, and different organizations together with the Ontario Provincial Police and the Royal Canadian Mounted Police.

It’s that clause which Coun. Robert Chambers questioned within the assembly — and that the county could be voting on St. Catharines’ decision, reasonably than the one which was initiated in Halton.

“The movement in and of itself shouldn’t be objectionable, I merely wasn’t clear on what municipalities or different entities it was to be forwarded on to,” Coun. David Miller instructed The Spectator.

Article content material

He added “there may be nothing within the movement that isn’t already lined off by way of federal or provincial legal guidelines and/or the Municipal Act and/or our personal code of conduct.”

Coun. Brian Coleman instructed The Spec he helps it “in precept” however sees no cause for a decision when all the pieces in it’s “in place already.”

The Spectator didn’t hear again from requests to councillors John Peirce, John MacAlpine or Robert Chambers.

In a Facebook publish, Oakley and Coun. John Bell reaffirmed their dedication to “making a secure, equitable surroundings for all to take part in our democracy, as voters, as advocates, and as future, current, and previous candidates or elected officers.”

Celeste Percy-Beauregard is a Local Journalism Initiative Reporter primarily based on the Hamilton Spectator. The initiative is funded by the Government of Canada.

Article content material