Russian lawyer Andrei Kapustin, 32, identified for serving to victims of botched beauty surgical procedure, died on the working desk throughout a hair transplant
A younger lawyer identified for successful compensation for victims of beauty surgical procedure failures has died on the working desk throughout a hair transplant.
Andrei Kapustin, 32, a outstanding Russian lawyer, dealt with many high-profile civil circumstances, together with claims from victims of botched beauty procedures. He reportedly paid £3,000 to a non-public clinic in Vladivostok, within the Russian Far East, for a hair transplant.
Soon after being administered anaesthesia, his situation “immediately worsened” and he died on the working desk, in response to native stories. Ahead of his hair transplant, Mr Kapustin is alleged to have undergone examinations, blood checks and an electrocardiogram.
READ MORE: ‘I flew to Lithuania for £8,000 facelift – now I’ve misplaced listening to and have lopsided face’READ MORE: Major Turkey BBL demise replace as lawyer points Hayley Dowell case warning
He was suggested to keep away from ingesting alcohol and smoking, native media stories. The Russian Investigative Committee is investigating the reason for his demise, in response to Zolotoy Most.
Mr Kapustin is survived by his spouse Alena, 33, additionally a lawyer specialising in medical circumstances, and their two-year-old daughter Katya. His devastated household and colleagues are reportedly contemplating authorized motion in opposition to the clinic.
Earlier this 12 months, Mr Kapustin gained round £10,000 in compensation for consumer Anastasia Kasyanchuk, 28, after she suffered problems following a ‘buttock raise’. A courtroom discovered the process had brought about an an infection after dermal fillers had been injected into her buttocks with an extended needle.
Photographs introduced in courtroom confirmed the extent of bruising and swelling. “After I bought the abscess, all of it leaked out,” Ms Kasyanchuk reportedly mentioned in courtroom. “As it turned out, it was low-quality hyaluronic acid, and it was not licensed in any means.”
Ms Kapustin mentioned she had paid £3,000 for the ‘butt raise’ process. Mr Kapustin argued on the time: “It is clear that there isn’t any license, no medical documentation, no consent and no details about attainable penalties.”
The medic, recognized as Dr F, was ordered to pay Ms Kasyanchuk compensation for the injections, the price of “repairing” the harm and “ethical damages”.
