Hyderabad: Justice B. Vijaysen Reddy of the Telangana High Court ordered discover to the Thumkunta municipality commissioner in a contempt case pertaining to the non-halting of unauthorised constructions. The choose was coping with a contempt case filed by Magam Sanjeeva Reddy, alleging wilful disobedience of the orders handed by the choose in a writ plea.
The writ plea was filed difficult the inaction of the municipal authorities in stopping the development undertaken by non-public respondents Seetharam Reddy and Chandrika at Anthaipally that was happening with out a sanctioned constructing plan. The choose in a writ plea earlier had directed the Thumkunta municipality commissioner to forthwith cease the continuing building and act on the petitioner’s illustration in accordance with the Telangana Municipalities Act.
The petitioner alleged that the commissioner didn’t comply and allowed building to proceed, thereby committing contempt. The choose posted the matter to October 24.
Justice Surepalli Nanda of the Telangana High Court directed the panchayat raj division and different state authorities to depend the previous momentary service rendered by a retired contingent worker in the direction of qualifying service for pension and gratuity. The choose was coping with a writ plea filed by A. Rajaiah, contingent sweeper from 1983. His companies had been regularised in 2018, and he retired in February 2020.
The petitioner contended that regardless of three many years of service, his momentary employment between 1983 and 2018 was ignored for computation of pensionary advantages, opposite to a authorities order of 1983, and binding judicial precedents. He relied on Supreme Court rulings which held that work-charged or contingent service have to be reckoned for pension functions.
The choose reiterated that pension shouldn’t be a bounty, however property protected beneath the Constitution, and that denial of counting previous service was in violation of the Constitution. Accordingly, the choose directed the respondents to consider the petitioner’s momentary service for computation of qualifying service, and to launch pension, gratuity, and different retirement advantages as per legislation.
