OPINION — In early 2024, the American public acquired a stark warning from prime U.S. safety officers. Chinese state-sponsored hackers, generally known as “Volt Typhoon,” had penetrated not simply information repositories however embedded themselves deep throughout the management programs of U.S. crucial infrastructure—together with communication networks, power grids, and water remedy services. As FBI Director Christopher Wray testified, the intent was a “pre-positioning of capabilities that may be turned on at any time when they see match” to “wreak havoc and trigger real-world hurt to American residents and communities.” This was not espionage within the conventional sense—it was operational preparation of the atmosphere at a strategic scale.
No photographs have been fired, nor territory seized—but this was an act of calculated, strategic hostility. Volt Typhoon is one battle in a a lot bigger, undeclared battle: the grey warfare the PRC is waging in opposition to the United States.
How did we get right here? In the late twentieth and early twenty first centuries, the People’s Republic of China (PRC) started to formally articulate a brand new strategy to battle that diverged considerably from conventional warfare. This strategic evolution was first evident in 1999 with the publication of “Unrestricted Warfare” by two People’s Liberation Army (PLA) colonels, Qiao Liang and Wang Xiangsui. This groundbreaking conceptualization expanded the battlefield past purely navy engagements to embody an unlimited array of domains, together with financial, authorized, and informational spheres.
Further solidifying this new paradigm, the PRC subsequently adopted the “Three Warfares” doctrine in 2003. This formalized framework particularly outlined three interconnected non-kinetic operations: psychological warfare, public opinion warfare, and authorized warfare. Together, “Unrestricted Warfare” and the “Three Warfares” doctrine laid a profound mental and doctrinal basis for China’s technique of confronting powers just like the United States in ways in which deliberately stopped wanting direct navy battle. Despite their important implications for world safety and China’s evolving strategy to worldwide relations, these paradigms largely escaped widespread public discover and important scrutiny within the Western world on the time of their introduction. It’s laborious to know exactly when China’s grey warfare started, however we are able to see the doctrinal foundation for that warfare taking form in 1999 and 2003.
Today, the grey zone could be described because the geopolitical house between peace and warfare the place nations conduct actions to advance their nationwide pursuits, assault and weaken their adversaries, and presumably set the circumstances for a future warfare with out triggering a navy response. It is the area of deniability, ambiguity, and incremental aggression. As scholar Hal Brands has argued, it’s the popular software of revisionist powers in search of to problem the prevailing order.
The PRC’s aggressive actions are usually not remoted, unconnected occasions to realize tactical positive aspects, however fairly the grey zone is the central entrance in Beijing’s strategic competitors with the United States. Its goal is to not defeat the United States on a standard battlefield, however to orchestrate a strategic defeat by a thousand cuts—eroding American energy, affect, and resilience, whereas reshaping the worldwide order to swimsuit Beijing’s ambitions, all with out triggering a direct navy response. Its final goal is to realize a victory so full that by the point America acknowledges the totality of its loss, the price of reversing it can have turn out to be insurmountably excessive.
Defining Strategic Defeat in a Gray War
The idea of strategic defeat has traditionally been tied to the battlefield: the give up of a military, the autumn of a capital, the destruction of cities and infrastructure, the large lack of life, the signing of a treaty on an adversary’s phrases. In a grey warfare, the metrics of victory and defeat are essentially totally different. They are usually not measured in territory misplaced however in entry and affect ceded, not in ships sunk however in alliances fractured and capabilities sidelined, not in casualties however in confidence shattered and resolution autonomy undermined.
Strategic defeat within the context of a grey warfare could be outlined as: The cumulative lack of relative energy, autonomy, and world affect throughout cognitive, geopolitical, navy, financial, and technological domains—leading to a diminished potential to discourage, resist, or successfully reply to an adversary’s actions and ambitions.
What does this imply in sensible phrases? For the United States, it might imply a future the place the U.S. greenback is now not the undisputed world reserve foreign money, weakening America’s potential to levy efficient sanctions. It would imply a world the place American safety ensures are now not trusted by allies, forcing nations within the Indo-Pacific and Europe to accommodate Beijing’s calls for.
For potential companions, it might imply the trail of least resistance is to align with a brand new heart of gravity in Beijing. And for our world adversaries, it might sign that the period of American primacy is over, emboldening them to problem the worldwide norms the United States has lengthy championed.
As the 2022 U.S. National Security Strategy states, the PRC is “the one competitor with each the intent to reshape the worldwide order and, more and more, the financial, diplomatic, navy, and technological energy to do it.” Strategic defeat is the conclusion of that intent.
The Cipher Brief brings expert-level context to nationwide and world safety tales. It’s by no means been extra necessary to grasp what’s occurring on this planet. Upgrade your entry to unique content material by turning into a subscriber.
The Six Fronts of China’s Gray War
Beijing has advanced its authentic “Three Warfares” doctrine and is now waging a coordinated grey warfare throughout six interconnected fronts. Success on every axis shouldn’t be vital; fairly, incremental positive aspects in a single space generate vulnerabilities in one other, making a cascading strategic impact. The wrestle shouldn’t be confined to the navy area however extends to economics, know-how, diplomacy, and cognition itself. If left uncontested, Beijing may erode U.S. alliances, undermine deterrence, and form a strategic atmosphere wherein America’s selections are constrained earlier than battle ever begins.
Dominate the Cognitive Environment
China seeks to regulate the worldwide narrative, portraying itself as a accountable rising energy whereas casting the United States as a declining, chaotic hegemon. PLA doctrine explicitly identifies the cognitive area as a brand new battlefield, the place notion and perception are as contested as territory.
The State Department’s Global Engagement Center – which was disbanded earlier this yr – documented Beijing’s ways: seeding pro-PRC messaging by international media, deploying bot networks to inflame divisions in democratic societies, and spreading disinformation on points starting from COVID-19’s origins to the integrity of U.S. elections. Through its United Front system—a singular mix of affect and interference actions, in addition to intelligence operations that the CCP makes use of to form its political atmosphere—Beijing targets people, social and political teams, academia, enterprise leaders, navy leaders, coverage makers and U.S. allies with persuasive narratives, manipulated imagery, and coercive stress. It is an assault on cognition. The goal is to isolate the United States from its allies and demoralize the American public, thereby undermining the nationwide functionality—and can—to compete. This is a warfare over data, perception, and decision-making autonomy—one that would show decisive.
Limit U.S. Military Deterrence Options
The PLA has spent three many years creating a formidable Anti-Access/Area Denial functionality. As detailed within the Pentagon’s annual China Military Power Report, this community of long-range anti-ship missiles, built-in air defenses, and superior naval platforms is designed to make it prohibitively harmful for U.S. forces to function within the seas and skies round China’s periphery. The objective is to neutralize America’s major power—its energy projection—and create a state of affairs, significantly over Taiwan, the place Washington hesitates to intervene.
The PRC’s intent is that intimidation, threats, and acknowledged redlines add cognitive power to its navy deterrence and its efforts to form U.S. navy choices to its benefit. PLA’s “deterrence by demonstration”—which employs fixed aggressive maneuvers within the Taiwan Strait, missile launches, and aggressive intercepts—is designed to extend psychological stress and a way of inevitability, erode resolve, intimidate, and coerce choices favorable to China. The speedy enlargement of China’s nuclear arsenal (DF-41 ICBMs, new silos) additionally broadens Beijing’s deterrence toolkit.
It is probably going that the PRC can be extra provocative if it believes the United States is unlikely to reply for worry of escalation. Furthermore, Beijing carefully observes the Western response to Russia’s warfare in Ukraine, treating it as a live-fire case examine of Western resolve and military-industrial capability, calibrating its personal grey warfare accordingly in what quantities to a strategic partnership with Moscow.
Erode and Displace U.S. Power, Altering Geopolitical Norms
Where the U.S. as soon as led in constructing the post-war worldwide order, China now works diligently to co-opt or supplant it. Through initiatives just like the Belt and Road Initiative, the PRC has used its huge financial sources to create dependencies, gaining political leverage and, in instances like Sri Lanka’s Hambantota Port, management of strategic belongings, whereas additionally working to undermine American entry and affect. As the U.S. alerts an intent to withdraw investments and presence from some international locations and areas, the PRC will search to fill these vacuums.
The PRC’s building and weaponization of latest islands to alter worldwide boundaries within the South China Sea are additionally a part of its technique to create new geopolitical realities that increase PRC presence and affect. Simultaneously, Beijing has efficiently positioned its officers in key management positions inside United Nations our bodies, influencing the setting of worldwide requirements on all the pieces from know-how to aviation in ways in which favor its personal authoritarian mannequin. PRC affect within the International Telecommunication Union and efforts to set requirements for 5G, AI governance, and web “sovereignty”—all erode the liberal worldwide order in an try to sideline American affect.
Weaken and Compromise Essential U.S. National Systems
The Volt Typhoon intrusions are probably the most seen component of a concerted marketing campaign to carry American crucial infrastructure in danger and “put together the battlefield,” however there are others. According to media stories, the PRC has tried to penetrate and compromise, with blended outcomes, U.S. power, water, communications, transportation, and data infrastructure in addition to authorities organizations. U.S. house infrastructure and rising AI infrastructure, corresponding to information facilities, are additionally susceptible.
The PRC’s state-sponsored hackers have additionally engaged in persistent, widespread financial espionage, focusing on U.S. companies, universities, and analysis labs to steal the mental property that kinds the spine of the American economic system. Former FBI Director Wray has acknowledged that the PRC’s hacking program is bigger than that of each different main nation mixed. This entrance of the grey warfare goals to weaken America from inside, creating systemic brittleness and giving Beijing coercive leverage in a disaster.
Manipulate Economic Dependencies and Supply Chains
For many years, the West considered financial interdependence with China as a pressure for liberalization. Beijing, nonetheless, noticed it as a strategic vulnerability to be cultivated and exploited. The PRC has weaponized its dominant place in crucial provide chains, as seen when it restricted exports of gallium and germanium in 2023 in response to U.S. semiconductor controls. Its management over the processing of some 90% of the world’s uncommon earth minerals provides it a chokehold over inputs important to the U.S. protection and know-how industries. This financial statecraft, documented in case research by the Peterson Institute for International Economics, is used to punish and coerce different nations, demonstrating to the world the prices of defying Beijing.
Other dependencies are equally regarding. The United States stays reliant on China for prescription drugs and lively pharmaceutical components , batteries, and photo voltaic panel elements—sectors the place Beijing may impose sharp prices on adversaries. Through such statecraft, China demonstrates the penalties for defiance and alerts that financial integration is a vulnerability, not a safeguard.
Gain Technological Superiority over the U.S.
The closing and maybe most important entrance is the race for technological supremacy. Through state-directed insurance policies like “Made in China 2025” and its “Military-Civil Fusion” technique, the PRC is mobilizing the total energy of its state and society to dominate the foundational applied sciences of the twenty first century: synthetic intelligence, quantum computing, biotechnology, and next-generation telecommunications.
China already leads the world in patent filings for AI, fintech, and quantum encryption. Leadership in these fields, as argued in stories by the Special Competitive Studies Project (SCSP), is not going to solely drive future financial development however can even confer decisive navy and intelligence benefits. China’s theft of U.S. mental property has straight accelerated its technological development in each business and navy sectors, usually permitting Chinese companies and state entities to leapfrog developmental obstacles and compete globally with U.S. corporations. The PRC shouldn’t be merely in search of to catch up; it’s decided to leapfrog the United States at any value and write the foundations for the following technological period.
Need a day by day dose of actuality on nationwide and world safety points? Subscriber to The Cipher Brief’s Nightcap publication, delivering skilled insights on at this time’s occasions – proper to your inbox. Sign up without spending a dime at this time.
American Vulnerabilities and Responses
China’s grey warfare technique is efficient as a result of it expertly exploits the inherent vulnerabilities of an open, democratic society. The openness of the U.S. economic system and educational establishments, a standard supply of power, creates avenues for know-how theft and malign affect. America’s political polarization, amplified by social media, is a fertile floor for PRC info operations. A chaotic world info atmosphere, which is on the fingertips of information-hungry Americans, additional supplies infrastructure, camouflage, and infinite surrogates for China’s cognitive warfare efforts.
The United States shouldn’t be idle. It has lastly woke up to the problem. The 2022 CHIPS and Science Act represents a historic funding to revive home semiconductor manufacturing. Stricter export controls, led by the Commerce Department, goal to gradual China’s progress in superior computing. New and strengthened alliances, chief amongst them the AUKUS pact with Australia and the United Kingdom, are designed to bolster collective deterrence within the Indo-Pacific.
These responses, whereas vital, stay largely fragmented and they’re created throughout the context and the confines of the “rules-based world order” that the PRC usually ignores. As many analysts at establishments just like the Center for a New American Security have argued, the U.S. authorities remains to be largely structured for a bygone period. It lacks the built-in, whole-of-government equipment required to successfully counter a holistic, long-term grey zone competitor. We are waging a networked warfare with a hierarchical forms, responding to discrete crises fairly than waging a proactive, steady marketing campaign. And the instruments that we regularly select to make use of, corresponding to relying solely on diplomacy and restricted help to regional allies to dissuade Beijing from asserting its sovereignty within the South China Sea, are unsuccessful in inducing PRC compliance.
China’s Confidence and Risks
Beijing’s confidence on this technique is rooted in its personal strategic tradition and its notion of American decline. The Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) ideology, particularly beneath Xi Jinping, is saturated with the narrative of an “East rising and West declining,” a perception that historical past is on China’s aspect. This fashionable confidence is layered atop an historic strategic custom, epitomized by Sun Tzu, that prizes victory with out direct battle (shangbing fa mou). A grey warfare is the final word expression of this philosophy: to win by outmaneuvering, outwitting, and demoralizing the opponent till their will to withstand collapses.
Yet, this technique is fraught with danger—for China. In his e-book The Long Game, Rush Doshi argues that Beijing’s aggressive flip has prematurely woke up a sleeping large, galvanizing the very anti-China coalition it sought to keep away from. Every coercive commerce motion, each act of cyber aggression, and each belligerent assertion pushes the United States. and its allies nearer collectively. The best danger of all is miscalculation. A grey zone motion over Taiwan—corresponding to a declaration of a “quarantine”—may simply be misinterpreted, spiraling right into a devastating sizzling warfare that may shatter China’s financial ambitions and probably threaten the CCP’s grip on energy.
Disrupting China’s Gray War and Imposing Costs
Recognizing that we’re in a grey warfare is the first, foundational step. Winning it requires a elementary shift in American technique from response to proaction. As famous in a earlier Cipher Brief article, the U.S. has to rethink, retool, and reorient in order that it’s as ready for a grey warfare as it’s for conventional battle; that has but to be achieved. Further, the U.S. should perceive and handle danger within the grey zone. The grey zone is crammed with actual threats, many issues that aren’t actual, and outright deception.
Russia, China, and Iran flood the data atmosphere with false and manipulated info; fabricated organizations and occasions; persuasive however false nationwide narratives; and calculated threats and intimidation meant to weaken our resolve, impair our judgment, and push us towards choices that favor their pursuits. Despite this grey zone “fog of warfare”, the U.S. and its allies should transfer past merely defending in opposition to China’s grey zone aggressions and start to actively disrupt them, impose significant prices, and shift from a defensive to an offensive posture. A method to take action should embrace 4 key strains of effort:
First, systematic publicity. The United States should win the battle for fact by systematically declassifying and publicly attributing PRC grey zone actions in near-real-time. By stripping away the cloak of deniability from actions like Volt Typhoon or covert affect operations, Washington can rally home and worldwide opinion, making it more durable for Beijing to function. This publicity can even happen at very senior ranges. China shouldn’t be capable of have interaction in commerce or diplomatic talks with the United States with out answering for its systematic assaults on U.S. sovereignty, establishments, crucial infrastructure, and world affect.
Second, impose proportional prices. For too lengthy, China’s grey zone actions have been low-cost and low-risk. Washington. should change the PRC’s risk-gain calculation, which at present demonstrates that the PRC sees extra positive aspects than dangers in its grey zone actions. U.S.leaders should communicate clearly to the PRC and different adversaries on the prices of their grey zone assaults. The United States should lead a coalition to develop a menu of pre-planned, rapid-response choices. If China makes use of financial coercion in opposition to an ally, the G7 ought to reply with coordinated reduction funds and joint authorized challenges. If a Chinese entity is caught stealing mental property, it ought to face crippling sanctions.
Third, construct collective resilience—not simply on the nationwide degree, however throughout society and allied networks. Strengthening resilience means making certain U.S. intelligence assortment and evaluation is sharply targeted on evolving grey zone threats. The United States ought to deepen safety, intelligence, and disaster response cooperation with core allies by frameworks like AUKUS and the so-called “Quad alliance” (an off-the-cuff safety dialogue involving Australia, India, Japan, and the United States), whereas additionally investing in broader multi-level partnerships that embrace the non-public sector and academia. The U.S. and its allies ought to pioneer an “financial NATO” mannequin, creating shared security nets and coordinated protection packages in order that an financial or cyberattack in opposition to one is met with speedy collective assist from all members.
Domestically, resilience is necessary as a result of PRC cyberattacks, threats to crucial infrastructure, and efforts to sow dissent, undermine U.S. establishments, intervene with provide chains, and affect U.S. decision-making can impression all Americans. Resilience begins with knowledgeable management in any respect ranges of presidency and well timed info sharing so communities and companies can belief public info and know the right way to reply.
Finally, goal the architects. Sanctions and different punitive measures shouldn’t solely goal company entities but additionally the precise Chinese Communist Party officers and PLA officers who design and direct these grey zone campaigns. Making the battle private for the people concerned raises the stakes and might deter future aggression.
The problem posed by China’s grey warfare is formidable, however it isn’t insurmountable. The United States stands at a crucial juncture: both we proceed to reply in a disjointed method, or we forge a unified, proactive technique to counter Beijing’s multifaceted aggression. This calls for an instantaneous, built-in, whole-of-nation response throughout all domains—governmental, non-public sector, and civil society—to systematically expose and construct collective resilience in opposition to Beijing’s coercive actions. And it requires U.S. decisionmakers to beat their worry of escalation and eventually impose actual prices on Beijing for partaking in grey warfare in opposition to the U.S. Failure to behave decisively now dangers a strategic defeat by incremental erosion, essentially reshaping the worldwide order and diminishing American affect for generations to return.
All statements of reality, opinion, or evaluation expressed are these of the writer and don’t replicate the official positions or views of the U.S. Government. Nothing within the contents must be construed as asserting or implying U.S. Government authentication of knowledge or endorsement of the writer’s views.
The Cipher Brief is dedicated to publishing a variety of views on nationwide safety points submitted by deeply skilled nationwide safety professionals.
Opinions expressed are these of the writer and don’t symbolize the views or opinions of The Cipher Brief.
Have a perspective to share based mostly in your expertise within the nationwide safety area? Send it to Editor@thecipherbrief.com for publication consideration.
Read extra expert-driven nationwide safety insights, perspective and evaluation in The Cipher Brief
